| To: | Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Current status? |
| From: | Pekka Pietikainen <Pekka.Pietikainen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:22:30 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | stp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20001026031402.J8597@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-stp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > Good morning everyone, > > what is the current status of STP for Linux? Hi 102MB/s with 1MB AceNIC's with jumbo frames using < 5% CPU is what I currently get ;) > STP may be interesting to us for network attached storage and replication over > the network. > > Is STP available from inside the kernel? Does it work with 2.2 or 2.4? The current code assumes that the protocol is used from userland (it tries to use map_user_kiobuf for every case). I'm looking at fixing that soon, though using nbd as a testcase. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Current status?, Lars Marowsky-Bree |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Current status?, Stephen Bailey |
| Previous by Thread: | Current status?, Lars Marowsky-Bree |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Current status?, Stephen Bailey |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |