| To: | Mary_Ann_DelBusso@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: dd.raw: /dev/raw/raw1: Invalid argument |
| From: | Scott Lurndal <slurn@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:57:23 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | slurn@xxxxxxxxxxx (Scott Lurndal), braddr@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Brad Roberts), rawio@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <ctJu9zM99g1Q0pOqE0@xxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Mary_Ann_DelBusso@xxxxxxxxxxxx" at Jun 26, 2000 02:35:43 PM |
| Sender: | owner-rawio@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > > straces shows: > read(4, 0x804f000, 512) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument The arguments here look fine: (buffer address is congruent to zero modulo the sector size and the transfer length is also congruent to zero modulo the sector size). I suspect problems using /dev/raw (which is an extremely ugly interface anyway). > > The patches I picked up from http://oss.sgi.com/projects/rawio > are specifically made for the 2.2.13 linux kernel. > > Thanks, > Mary Ann > While the /dev/raw stuff was included in the 2.2 sgi raw I/O work, it wasn't tested nor used, rather we used the standard unix raw device paradigm: so try this instead: # mknod /dev/rsdb1 c 8 17 # mknod /dev/rsdc1 c 8 33 -- # dd.raw if=/dev/rsdb1 of=/dev/rsdc1 bs=2048 -- scott |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: dd.raw: /dev/raw/raw1: Invalid argument, Mary_Ann_DelBusso |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: dd.raw: /dev/raw/raw1: Invalid argument, Mary_Ann_DelBusso |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: dd.raw: /dev/raw/raw1: Invalid argument, Mary_Ann_DelBusso |
| Next by Thread: | Re: dd.raw: /dev/raw/raw1: Invalid argument, Mary_Ann_DelBusso |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |