| To: | "Matt D. Robinson" <yakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Raw I/O enhancements for 2.3.99.pre9-2 kernels. |
| From: | Chaitanya Tumuluri <chait@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 08 Jun 2000 10:45:23 -0700 |
| Cc: | rawio@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Thu, 08 Jun 2000 10:25:36 PDT." <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005262348150.26200-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-rawio@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 08 Jun 2000 10:25:36 PDT, "Matt D. Robinson" <yakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>On Fri, 26 May 2000, Chaitanya Tumuluri wrote:
>|>Hey Matt! What kind of problems and which kernel are you talking
>|>about? D'ju have any particular testcase I could use?
>
>I got it to work ... the deal is not to use map_kernel_kiobuf() for
>the stuff I'm doing. It's better just to do something like:
Cool. Thats good to know. What was the problem you had with
map_kernel_kiobuf() anyways?
Question: Do you take care not to alloc from highmem, to avoid
bouncing?
>
> /* do brw_kiovec on the kiobuf here */
>
Why brw_kiovec? That would send you into the buffer-head path and slow
you down by as much as 40%. Why not the rawio path (i.e. try_kiobuf_io()
in drivers/char/raw.c)?
Cheers,
-Chait.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Raw I/O enhancements for 2.3.99.pre9-2 kernels., Matt D. Robinson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Raw I/O enhancements for 2.3.99.pre9-2 kernels., Matt D. Robinson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Raw I/O enhancements for 2.3.99.pre9-2 kernels., Matt D. Robinson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Raw I/O enhancements for 2.3.99.pre9-2 kernels., Matt D. Robinson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |