pro64-support
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: multi-entry CFG

To: Shin-Ming Liu <shinmingliu@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: multi-entry CFG
From: Peng Zhao <pengzhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:47:14 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: David Stephenson <dlstephe@xxxxxxx>, sgi <pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20010828162448.8586.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Shin-Ming Liu wrote:

> 
> 
> --- Peng Zhao <pengzhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 2. Is there any special reason to left the
> > "dangling" entry there?
> 
> The existence of dangling block is the consequence
> of funny code as David has pointed out.  Either you
> avoid generating it or clean up in a separate pass.
> We have chosen the latter by utilizing DCE.  It
> appeared to be the most cost effective solution at
> that time.  Does the dangling block give you extra
> headache?

No. Thanks

>  
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
> http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
> 

-- 
                Regards

                                          Peng
--
  Peng Zhao   pengzhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx   
  http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~pengzhao   
  TEL (Lab): (780)492-3725                  Lab:  CSC251



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>