pro64-support
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: multi-entry CFG

To: Peng Zhao <pengzhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Stephenson <dlstephe@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: multi-entry CFG
From: Shin-Ming Liu <shinmingliu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: sgi <pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0108262200410.28336-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx

--- Peng Zhao <pengzhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> 2. Is there any special reason to left the
> "dangling" entry there?

The existence of dangling block is the consequence
of funny code as David has pointed out.  Either you
avoid generating it or clean up in a separate pass.
We have chosen the latter by utilizing DCE.  It
appeared to be the most cost effective solution at
that time.  Does the dangling block give you extra
headache?
 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>