pro64-support
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Hyperblock bug?

To: mcnaught@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Hyperblock bug?
From: Richard Shapiro <rshapiro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 11:50:55 -0400
Cc: pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10104182254200.29428-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (message from Matthew McNaughton on Wed, 18 Apr 2001 22:57:26 -0600 (MDT))
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10104182254200.29428-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx
   At be/cg/hb_id_candidates.cxx, ~line 627 (version 0.12):

         if (!BB_SET_MemberP(BB_dom_set(pdom), dom)) {
           for (dom = Find_Immediate_Dominator(dom);
                dom && !BB_SET_MemberP(BB_dom_set(pdom), dom);
                dom = Find_Immediate_Dominator(pdom));
         }

   I think the last call to Find_Immediate_Dominator(pdom) should be
   Find_Immediate_Dominator(dom).

Refresh my memory. Why do you think this? Could you send out a larger chunk
of the code (since I don;t have an active development set right now).

-- 
Richard Shapiro
Ab Initio Software Corporation
rshapiro@xxxxxxxxxxxx
(781) 301-2311

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>