| To: | pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | sgicc and -fvolatile |
| From: | Sterling Augustine <Sterling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:16:07 -0700 |
| Sender: | owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Although sgicc accepts -fvolatile, it does not pass it to the front or back ends (diffing the verbose output with and without the option reveals no differences.) Is there a reason for that? Do the front ends actually support -fvolatile, but there is a bug in the driver, or should the driver be warning about an option that has no effect? (Or does anyone actually know what should be happening?) Sterling sterling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Member of Technical Staff Tensilica, Inc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Bug in sgicc version 0.01.0-13, Nenad Nedeljkovic |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: sgicc and -fvolatile, Michael Murphy |
| Previous by Thread: | Bug in sgicc version 0.01.0-13, Robboy, David G |
| Next by Thread: | Re: sgicc and -fvolatile, Michael Murphy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |