| To: | "'Douglas Johnson'" <djohnson@xxxxxxx>, "Chan, Sun C" <sun.c.chan@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: auto-pic or non-auto-pic |
| From: | "Chan, Sun C" <sun.c.chan@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:12:28 -0800 |
| Cc: | "'Kratzer, Willi'" <Willi.Kratzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Looks like I've spoken too hastily. It is not simply pic vs non-pic. I apologize. Apparently, it has to do with the function descriptor portion of the ABI. Sun > -----Original Message----- > From: Douglas Johnson [mailto:djohnson@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 2:46 PM > To: Chan, Sun C > Cc: 'Kratzer, Willi'; 'pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx' > Subject: RE: auto-pic or non-auto-pic > > > This message uses a character set that is not supported by > the Internet Service. To view the original message content, > open the attached message. If the text doesn't display > correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then open it > using a viewer that can display the original character set. > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: auto-pic or non-auto-pic, Douglas Johnson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Feedback in Pro64, David Stephenson |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: auto-pic or non-auto-pic, Chan, Sun C |
| Next by Thread: | creating a feedback mechanism, A. Cameron Macdonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |