pro64-support
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Some error messages and questions

To: Peng Zhao <pengzhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Some error messages and questions
From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Mar 2001 16:54:28 -0500
Cc: Jacques-Olivier Haenni <Jacques-Olivier.Haenni@xxxxxxx>, sgi <pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103102211170.24840-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Peng Zhao's message of "Sat, 10 Mar 2001 22:21:44 -0700 (MST)")
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103102211170.24840-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.2 (Thalia)
Peng Zhao <pengzhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi,
> > 
> > : -Ofast is not supported yet.  It uses ipa, which has not been released yet
> > : (but will be soon).  Use -O3 for now.
>       
> In the source code of Pro64, there is a directory named ipa. Isn't it the
> ipa you have meant?
> 
> What is the difference of the light-weight inliner, standalone inliner and
> IPA? Although I have read several times of the mannual of the IPA(5), I
> am still confused on this.    
> 
> When I use "-INLINE:dfe=ON", it seems that it doesn't work: the dead
> function is not eliminated while it would never be called after inlining.. 
> I have a very
> simple program in which the main call the only function. The function is
> inlined, but the function is still there in the assembly program (.s).
> 

Is the function static?
If not, it can't eliminate it.
--Dan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>