| To: | Peng Zhao <pengzhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Some error messages and questions |
| From: | Daniel Berlin <dberlin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 11 Mar 2001 16:54:28 -0500 |
| Cc: | Jacques-Olivier Haenni <Jacques-Olivier.Haenni@xxxxxxx>, sgi <pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103102211170.24840-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Peng Zhao's message of "Sat, 10 Mar 2001 22:21:44 -0700 (MST)") |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103102211170.24840-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.2 (Thalia) |
Peng Zhao <pengzhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > > > > : -Ofast is not supported yet. It uses ipa, which has not been released yet > > : (but will be soon). Use -O3 for now. > > In the source code of Pro64, there is a directory named ipa. Isn't it the > ipa you have meant? > > What is the difference of the light-weight inliner, standalone inliner and > IPA? Although I have read several times of the mannual of the IPA(5), I > am still confused on this. > > When I use "-INLINE:dfe=ON", it seems that it doesn't work: the dead > function is not eliminated while it would never be called after inlining.. > I have a very > simple program in which the main call the only function. The function is > inlined, but the function is still there in the assembly program (.s). > Is the function static? If not, it can't eliminate it. --Dan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Some error messages and questions, Peng Zhao |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Some error messages and questions, Chandrasekhar Murthy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Some error messages and questions, Peng Zhao |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Some error messages and questions, Michael Murphy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |