Re: link flags?

pro64-support

Re: link flags?

To:	Martyn Foster <mfoster@xxxxxxx>, pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: link flags?
From:	"Ross A. Towle" <rat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:18:22 -0800
In-reply-to:	Martyn Foster <mfoster@xxxxxxx> "link flags?" (Feb 5, 10:54am)
References:	<BD39367DB2A5D311BB8C009027D0E37B02D3B08A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx

The following message happens and, for now, can be ignored:

> bt*/usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-cygnus-linux/2.96-ia64-000717/../../../libfortran.a
> (open.o):../../libf/fio/open.c:905: the use of `tempnam' is dangerous,
> better use `mkstemp'

This is due to the switch from glibc2.1 to glibc2.2.  With the next release
of Pro64 (ie 0.13) the runtime libraries will be fully converted to glibc2.2
and the message will not be seen.

-Ross

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
link flags?, Martyn Foster Message not available Re: link flags?, Ross A. Towle <=

Previous by Date:	Re: native linuxia64 compile possible, Ross A. Towle
Next by Date:	RE: native linuxia64 compile possible, Chan, Sun C
Previous by Thread:	link flags?, Martyn Foster
Next by Thread:	native linuxia64 compile possible, Dambacher
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]