pro64-support
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: sgif90 broken on 2.4.0test10-001115-55smp

To: Uros Prestor <uros@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wayne Vieira <wavieira@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: sgif90 broken on 2.4.0test10-001115-55smp
From: Wayne Vieira <wavieira@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 18:41:35 -0800
Cc: ia64-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <3A2EF34E.9F36A84B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hrmm....Well, then maybe my problem is somewhere else.  Because even my
simplest example core-dumps on execution with a segmentation fault.  I can
compile stuff with sgicc and sgiCC, but the sgif90.

Wayne

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Uros Prestor
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 6:18 PM
To: Wayne Vieira
Cc: ia64-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; pro64-support@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: sgif90 broken on 2.4.0test10-001115-55smp


Wayne Vieira wrote:

> [root@hose4 waynev]# sgif90 test.f
>
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-cygnus-linux/2.96-ia64-000717/../../../libfortran.a(op
> en.o):../../libf/fio/open.c:909: the use of `tempnam' is dangerous, better
> use `mkstemp'
> It has worked just fine on the 8/28 release.  Is anyone else getting this
> problem?  I can't seem to find any specific references to this being
broken.
> Any insight would be welcome.

This comes from the new glibc-2.2.  It's annoying but harmless (as far as I
can
tell).

Uros

--
Uros Prestor
uros@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wayne Vieira, RHCE               SGI Federal
Systems Engineer, Linux/IRIX     http://www.sgi.com/linux
waynev@xxxxxxx                   http://hose3.corp.sgi.com/linuxsgi



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>