pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] PCP libvirt PMDA

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] PCP libvirt PMDA
From: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:31:16 +0300
Cc: pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1243885428.9569187.1469589790597.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat
References: <1fa58d82-ac73-7747-c58d-acf880bc2155@xxxxxxxxxx> <20ae899d-50c6-1457-644f-f45ad26c63d4@xxxxxxxxxx> <37250089.6949181.1468900166388.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <fc9e92aa-355e-6cc1-7586-599847cf6cbe@xxxxxxxxxx> <1473242169.7374530.1468971331935.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <810341356.7539206.1469047436415.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <6030869a-395c-6d2f-9277-9d3d307c6bd1@xxxxxxxxxx> <1243885428.9569187.1469589790597.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2
Hi,

On 2016-07-27 06:23, Nathan Scott wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> [...]
>> PS. I'll be offline for a few weeks, I'll catch up with this then.
> 
> OK, we have a bit of a problem here in that the libvirt PMDA is merged
> but this metric naming / compound instance problem needs to be resolved
> It would be poor form to have to (attempt to) fix up users archives down
> the track when we know about the problem now I guess.

No, this is incorrect, there's no problem to fix as 9e96cf4 and 8d2f4dc
specifically addressed this:

http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=pcp/pcp.git;a=commit;h=9e96cf4
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=pcp/pcp.git;a=commit;h=8d2f4dc

Cheers,

-- 
Marko Myllynen

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>