| To: | Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: container/man build fix |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Jul 2016 03:06:54 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <87mvl3x5zq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <87mvl3x5zq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | h7J1KuRP9ZZCrjn9xsw6DXFOkkfq6A== |
| Thread-topic: | pcp updates: container/man build fix |
Hi Lukas,
----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> src/include/builddefs.in | 8 +++++++-
> 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Just this final chunk confuses me ...
INSTALL_MAN = \
- test -z "$$MAN_PAGES" && MAN_PAGES="$(MAN_PAGES)"; \
+ test -z "$$MAN_PAGES" && MAN_PAGES="$(MAN_PAGES)" && $(HAVE_MANPAGES); \
for d in `echo $$MAN_PAGES`; do \
The added HAVE_MANPAGES there looks like a no-op, or is it needed in some
subtle way? (note that final && is after a variable assignment). Is the
intent perhaps to have a separate
+ test $(HAVE_MANPAGES) || MAN_PAGES=""; \
before the "for" loop?
cheers.
--
Nathan
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] PCP libvirt PMDA, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: libpcp_json, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | pcp updates: container/man build fix, Lukas Berk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: container/man build fix, Lukas Berk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |