pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [pcp] qa/1111 failing pretty much every place it is run

To: "'Nathan Scott'" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Alec Ten Harmsel'" <alec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [pcp] qa/1111 failing pretty much every place it is run
From: "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:47:09 +1000
Cc: "'PCP'" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1224486916.6661922.1468813471599.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <57858370.8030700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <131083523.5554077.1468368582128.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <747918044.5554823.1468369188587.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <20160716204609.GB810@apio> <1224486916.6661922.1468813471599.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQKA/nNNppioZBdIVa92VrGPK10F9QLg0f5wAdlVgWgDLVhcTwIuUyjonm7D+rA=
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Scott [mailto:nathans@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 1:45 PM
> To: Alec Ten Harmsel <alec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Ken McDonell
> <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [pcp] qa/1111 failing pretty much every place it is run
> ...
> Looks good to me, thanks for following up Alec!  I'll merge shortly, and I'm
> expecting you'll already be seeing zero 1111 failures now, Ken, from earlier
> updates - let us know if not?  Taa.

Yep, no qa/1111 failures in the latest runs ... thanks.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>