pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pmrep: convert to use pmfg

To: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: pmrep: convert to use pmfg
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:19:20 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <6f5810f5-f3d2-c7f6-f079-3fb7504497b6@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <576926AB.7070608@xxxxxxxxxx> <717761407.765523.1466558073136.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <576FDCE3.9010706@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0mshvwjbpl.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <577F8261.5060008@xxxxxxxxxx> <20160708152452.GA29879@xxxxxxxxxx> <577FE2EC.9020103@xxxxxxxxxx> <6f5810f5-f3d2-c7f6-f079-3fb7504497b6@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: yp/eiFYFjTfF2mY9t1SCqr34lbLuRA==
Thread-topic: pmrep: convert to use pmfg
Hi Marko,

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> Below is now finally a patch which I don't plan to update at this
> stage any more unless there's some feedback (IOW, I think it's ready
> for merging).
> 

I'm seeing a handful of pmrep QA failures - one looks like a non-issue
(just whitespace, looks better aligned now actually), but the other two
look like potential regressions - Zabbix exporting fails (ah, see .bad
file attached for a stacktrace), & time window reporting differences.

.out, .bad & .full files attached; I've pushed this merge just to my own
tree for now (see next mail).

cheers.

--
Nathan

Attachment: 1068.full
Description: Binary data

Attachment: 1068.out
Description: Binary data

Attachment: 1068.out.bad
Description: Binary data

Attachment: 1069.out
Description: Binary data

Attachment: 1069.out.bad
Description: Binary data

Attachment: 1072.out
Description: Binary data

Attachment: 1072.out.bad
Description: Binary data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>