| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alec Ten Harmsel <alec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] qa/1111 failing pretty much every place it is run |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:11:00 +1000 |
| Cc: | PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <131083523.5554077.1468368582128.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <57858370.8030700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <131083523.5554077.1468368582128.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 |
On 13/07/16 10:09, Nathan Scott wrote: Hi guys, ----- Original Message -----I'm seeing 2 failure signatures. .out.bad files attached Any help would be appreciated as I have no clue what this test is or should be doing.This test is exercising the new pcp2influxdb(1) command. There should be a 1111.full associated with these failures, which I think we'll need to figure out what socat sees - could you post those too please for the two signatures? Attached.
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] qa/1111 failing pretty much every place it is run, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates: influxdb test tweaks, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [pcp] qa/1111 failing pretty much every place it is run, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] qa/1111 failing pretty much every place it is run, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
