pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: perl-LDAP prerequisite for rpm packages

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: perl-LDAP prerequisite for rpm packages
From: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 23:39:10 +0300
Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5785524A.6090909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat
References: <5785524A.6090909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2
Hi,

On 2016-07-12 23:25, Ken McDonell wrote:
> 
> I'm afraid you cannot simply do this ...

The commit message omitted the note I included with the patch email:

"Using Fedora/RHEL package names, hopefully ok."

This due to fact that I didn't check anything else outside of that
sphere. But ...

>     build: add to ds389{,log} RPM package dependencies
> 
> because perl-LDAP is not available as an rpm package for all platforms
> where we build PCP rpms, and in these cases we have the option of
> installing Net::LDAP via cpan so the PMDA works even when the rpm prereq
> is not satisified.

... which are these platforms? I wonder how realistic it is to expect
that someone is running 389 Directory Server on them.

Thanks,

-- 
Marko Myllynen

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>