| To: | pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | pmfg vs pmi |
| From: | Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:58:39 +0300 |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Red Hat |
| Reply-to: | Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 |
Hi Frank, With pmfg it's easy to report metrics but if one would want also to write archives, then it seems that pmfg and pmi do not dance together very well. More precisely, pmi.pmiAddMetric(), pmi.pmiAddInstance(), and pmi.pmiPutValue() need metrics details which pmfg tries to hide. Do you see it worthwhile or feasible to make if easier to write archives with pmfg or is it better / expected that one uses non-pmfg methods with archives? Thanks, -- Marko Myllynen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Bug 1348186] Suboptimal error messages with --container, bugzilla |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 1348244] New: pmlogcheck does not support compressed archives, bugzilla |
| Previous by Thread: | pmrep: add support for containers, Marko Myllynen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pmfg vs pmi, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |