| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PMDA with 2 levels of inst |
| From: | "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:58:15 -0400 |
| Cc: | "Hanafi, Mahmoud (ARC-TN)[Computer Sciences Corporation]" <mahmoud.hanafi@xxxxxxxx>, "pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
--text follows this line-- (sorry, necrothread followup, rescued a lost draft) kenj wrote: > [...] The underlying PCP data model supports only linear instance > domains, [...] Have we encountered modeling situtations where the downsides of the workarounds you listed in detail are hard to bear? I can think of a few cases, where we're sacrificing expressive power, like stats that naturally cross separate domains like per-process per-disk or per-network-peer traffic. At what point should we investigate generalizing to multiple indoms per metric? - FChE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Build fails in docker, Martins Innus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] pmrep: tweak unit string, Marko Myllynen |
| Previous by Thread: | Build fails in docker, Martins Innus |
| Next by Thread: | pcp updates - mgoodwin merge fix for derived memleak + QA, and nathans - QA rc_pmcd warnings, Mark Goodwin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |