| To: | "Wu, Liming" <wulm.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] çå: [patch] Add a new command pcp-ipcs |
| From: | Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:14:15 +0300 |
| Cc: | "pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <6A799D6419DDBA43B657744DC4113882FE3F65C3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Red Hat |
| References: | <6A799D6419DDBA43B657744DC4113882FE3F63B0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1615960628.52451231.1465196444123.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <6A799D6419DDBA43B657744DC4113882FE3F65C3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 |
Hi, On 2016-06-06 12:30, Wu, Liming wrote: > >> Nice work - it's great to see all the docs and QA work done too - thanks! I now had a bit of time to check it and it's nice work indeed. However, one minor question: The pcp-ipcs(1) man page lists quite a few options which are not supported (and not shown in pcp ipcs --help output) as it is almost a 1:1 copy of the ipcs(1) man page, would it make sense to list all the unsupported options under the CONFORMING TO section? For some reason some are listed already (like -a and -b) but not all (e.g., -s and -q). Thanks, -- Marko Myllynen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Verification and validation of performance metric values, William Cohen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] zsh completion support for pcp(1) command options, Marko Myllynen |
| Previous by Thread: | çå: [pcp] [patch] Add a new command pcp-ipcs, Wu, Liming |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] çå: [patch] Add a new command pcp-ipcs, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |