pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] [PATCH] pmda/memory_bandwidth: Add a new pmda to monitor the m

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] [PATCH] pmda/memory_bandwidth: Add a new pmda to monitor the maximum memory bandwidth
From: Hemant Kumar <hemant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 07:53:45 +0530
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <264659610.46630761.1462930975899.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1462545988-24166-1-git-send-email-hemant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1988503484.46420699.1462849683415.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5732505A.6080701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <264659610.46630761.1462930975899.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0


On 05/11/2016 07:12 AM, Nathan Scott wrote:
Hi Hemant,

----- Original Message -----
On 05/10/2016 08:38 AM, Nathan Scott wrote:
----- Original Message -----
[...]
Other than those things, it all looks good to me - with some added QA and
docs as usual.
Cool, I just sent a v2 to the list. Thanks for the comments.

I found we were a bit lacking in mem.* metrics in general, so I've added some
general testing and some specific testing to give us coverage here too.

Ah, ok.


Please have a look at tests 821 & 826 - there's still a bit to do, if you don't
mind taking that on.  It would be good to have some multi-node tests - so, we'd
need a new qa/linux/meminfo-root-002.tgz for that (and update to 821.out).  If
there's other unit cases missing from 826 in terms of config checking, please
go ahead & add some.

will do that.


In terms of docs, I think it would be OK to document this metric (esp. config)
in its long form help text (src/pmdas/linux/help) - just a few words about the
format & the sample config file, how one might use the metric, and so on.

Agreed and sent a patch for the same.

--
Thanks,
Hemant Kumar

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>