| To: | Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: multithreading etc. |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 6 May 2016 08:05:29 +1000 |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <572B5FA6.3080802@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20160502172853.GL24878@xxxxxxxxxx> <572B5FA6.3080802@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 |
On 06/05/16 00:58, Dave Brolley wrote: I gave this a quick review. The idea of separate locks for individual shared data objects looks ok to me. However, qa test 449 is hanging for me. Oops. In the disaster zone that is my QA farm since I returned, I failed to notice that 449 is also hanging for me. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] debian changes for python3, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [no subject], Suyash |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: multithreading etc., Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Next by Thread: | [Bug 1332263] New: pmcd.log noise upon targeting by pmfind -m probe=, bugzilla |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |