pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

GSoC: PCP versions of console tools - next steps

To: Sitaram Shelke <sitaramshelke@xxxxxxxxx>, pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: GSoC: PCP versions of console tools - next steps
From: Ryan Doyle <ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 20:19:57 +1000
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.7.2
Hi Sitaram,

How are you going looking at pmapi.h?

Nathan and myself have been discussing going forward think it might be a good idea to change some of the original plan and look at implementing pidstat before htop. We think this would be a gentler introduction to PCP and easier to implement too.

We we're thinking it could be the next thing to start working on in the bonding period (as opposed to bug fixing or other activities to engage with the PCP community).

It goes without saying that we don't expect you to just start the official GSoC early. The commitment during bonding period is different from the actual start date. We just think this might be the best use of your time during this period and to help understand the codebase as well.

Anyway, let me know what you think!

Cheers,
Ryan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • GSoC: PCP versions of console tools - next steps, Ryan Doyle <=