Comment # 6
on bug 1143
from Frank Ch. Eigler
> > [...] what are ["the person's"] concerns?
> (there were 3 listed in earlier comments.)
You were speaking of yourself in the third person. That is confusing.
> There seems to be no actual release model for pcp-webjs,
A formal model had not been necessary, because there was so little
development. But relief is in sight as we build more wrapper code
around grafana, etc. Henceforth, the "release model" consists of
a tag on the tree, wherefrom anyone can generate a tarball:
git archive --output=pcp-webjs-3.11.2.tar --prefix=/pcp-webjs/
--remote=git://sourceware.org/git/pcpfans.git pcp-webjs-3.11.2
> no documentation,
It has exactly the same amount of documentation in the release
tarballs as vector does: zero. It has considerable (at least as
much as vector) documentation online, at the graphite/grafana
upstream projects' web sites, where the webjs index.html
points.
> and it still contains a redundant, dated copy of Vector
That "dated" copy of vector is exactly the same version you just
bundled in the debian pcp 3.11.2 bintray builds. Mere redundancy
is harmless and your prior experience in removing it transfers
directly.
So, is that all stands in the way of debian webjs subpackages a
webjs analogy of your code in commit #19ee10f609?