| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Bug 1143] pcp-webjs not being shipped via bintray for ubuntu trusty |
| From: | bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Apr 2016 18:36:02 +0000 |
| Auto-submitted: | auto-generated |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <bug-1143-835@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/bugzilla/> |
| References: | <bug-1143-835@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/bugzilla/> |
|
Comment # 3
on bug 1143
from Zack Cerza
Thanks for the response. I'm a little confused about this: (In reply to comment #1) > The pcp-webjs code is not part of PCP. Hence its not really appropriate to > deb package it as part of the core PCP build (although there are options > like we do for rpm, see below). If it's "not appropriate" for pcp-webjs debs to be shipped with the rest of the pcp packages, why is that done on the rpm side? > There seems to be no actual release model for pcp-webjs, no documentation, > and it still contains a redundant, dated copy of Vector for some strange > reason, in spite of numerous requests for its maintainer (fche) to stop > duplicating that. Well, also, the Grafana version seems to be quite out-of-date as well. You are receiving this mail because:
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Client Certificates, Martins Innus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 1143] pcp-webjs not being shipped via bintray for ubuntu trusty, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | [Bug 1143] pcp-webjs not being shipped via bintray for ubuntu trusty, bugzilla-daemon |
| Next by Thread: | [Bug 1143] pcp-webjs not being shipped via bintray for ubuntu trusty, bugzilla-daemon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |