| To: | Paul Smith <psmith@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Parfait and javax.measure APIs |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Apr 2016 21:39:02 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <87382762.38798461.1460078596493.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | frCkucY9fFA11ZfzT247xPWqQ/15fg== |
| Thread-topic: | Parfait and javax.measure APIs |
Hi Paul, Do you know if anyone has looked into switching Parfait over to using the (recently standardized, AIUI) JSR 363 APIs for units? https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=363 Looks like the right thing to do would be to swap out JSR 275 use with that? I'll take a look if noone else has yet. I came across it while looking into the packaging side of things, so keen to use the "right" thing for the long term. Oh, reminds me - any thoughts on long term use of the org.custardsource namespace? Would "io.pcp.parfait" make sense? I don't mind either way just want to do any namespace switching upfront, before we start making any heavier use of it here. (RPM supports namespace aliases, so we can support both too if that's preferable). cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Cannot connect to PMCD on host "remotehost2": No route to host, thirumal rao |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 1325037] New: archive PM_MODE_FORW fetches not scanning to first occurrence of given metric, bugzilla |
| Previous by Thread: | pcp updates: qa/1069, Lukas Berk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Parfait and javax.measure APIs, Paul Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |