Nathan,
On 3/17/2016 7:25 PM, Nathan Scott wrote:
----- Original Message -----
I have a couple of QA failures (qa/1031) ...
Thread 1 terminated abnormally: Can't locate object method "sprint_job_info"
via package "Slurm" at pmdaslurm.pl line 152.
I think this one's resolved by commit e1bd80de5e ... ? (Martins, is there
a better way to fix it than that? i.e. with some additional test data?)
I added some more test data and stub code here:
https://github.com/ubccr/pcp/tree/slurm-qafix
Its a bit contrived, but does produce output as the real Slurm would.
Let me know what you think.
As a separate note, is there a way to short circuit all of the
initialization the the QA suite does when running a single check? I
guess in a "user beware" manner, allow things like
./check 1031
without creating all the initial pmlogger archives, etc that I know
aren't needed for this test. Not a huge deal, but it would be nice to
save some time when you need to go through the build/install/test cycle
a bunch of times before getting everything right. Then you could do a
full test as one final check.
Martins
commit ed916171685872f0500c92d1c3034ae84e9d09da
Author: Martins Innus <minnus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Mar 18 15:32:08 2016 +0000
Add some more qa coverage for the slurmpmda
qa/1031 | 2 ++
qa/1031.out | 9 +++++++++
qa/slurm/Slurm.pm | 2 +-
qa/slurm/Slurm/Hostlist.pm | 10 +++++++++-
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
|