Hi,
On 2016-03-09 00:52, Nathan Scott wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>>> As discussed on IRC, I've changed it to make version detection dynamic
>>> using a separate script, so that we avoid relying on the end-user doing
>>> the configuration themselves. Lightly tested, will flesh out the QA if
>>> you're thinking this approach still looks OK at this stage?
>> [...]
>>
>> Zabbix Agent (daemon) v2.4.7 (revision 56694) (12 November 2015)
>> Compilation time: Nov 13 2015 10:42:17
>>
>> zabbix_agentd (daemon) (Zabbix) 3.0.0
>> Revision 58460 15 February 2016, compilation time: Feb 15 2016 16:15:24
>
> /me shakes his head, wow
>
>> - did you test this with Zabbix agent or by some other means? I'm seeing
>
> Just tested the script, and only lightly (as mentioned) so as to not spend
> too much time on code that's not likely to go anywhere. Turned out to be
> a good idea...
>
> Ding, ding - here's round three, based on our IRC chat this morning - back
> to earlier thoughts along the dlsym(3) line. I'm assured it cannot fail,
> so compile-tested only at this stage.
Yes, thanks a lot, it didn't fail, works out perfectly, tested
zabbix-agent 2.4.7 and 3.0.0 on RHEL 7 using RPMs from Zabbix.
(Symbol-wise 2.2 is the same as 2.4.)
Cheers,
--
Marko Myllynen
|