| To: | Hemant Kumar <hemant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] perfevent_pmda: Add extension for perf derived events |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Feb 2016 20:09:07 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <56BE6E0D.6050101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1455060499-14670-1-git-send-email-hemant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1779243884.20121961.1455156620367.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <56BE6E0D.6050101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | 1we+3hBpoA8Q7AOOh3ETcDPTCZTwxw== |
| Thread-topic: | perfevent_pmda: Add extension for perf derived events |
Hi Hemant, ----- Original Message ----- > [...] > > One solution might be to add a metric permanently below that point, > > that is instantiated both with and without derived perfevent counts > > e.g. perfevent.derived.active (mirror the existing perfevent.active) > > - a count of #derived metrics - zero valued in the default case. > > Right. Sent a patch to add a metric perfevent.derived.active and > that should fix the warning. > http://www.pcp.io/pipermail/pcp/2016-February/009610.html > > Thanks for the suggestion! No problem, it works nicely here and fixes the issue. I think this new metric may need some help text though? Not sure how best to add that in with the scheme used, so I'll leave that for you too, if thats OK? Taa. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] qa/667 failing more often than passing, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] OpenBSD support, EPROTO question (#71), Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] perfevent_pmda: Add extension for perf derived events, Hemant Kumar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] perfevent_pmda: Add extension for perf derived events, Hemant Kumar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |