pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] QA Status

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] QA Status
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 01:05:11 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <56AF1AAA.1040700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <56AF1AAA.1040700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: 7Acs7+zEpKr5u0sI/IDLdTzG0GAKfg==
Thread-topic: QA Status

----- Original Message -----
> [expect these on a weekly basis from now on ...]
> 

Great, thanks Ken!

> === Synopsis ===
> 
> QA Status from Ken McDonell's QA Farm in Melbourne
> 
> Summary: 23391 run, 51 failed (0.22%)
> 
> Tests that failed on at least 9% of the QA hosts ...
> 
> QA Test  Failures  Failure Signatures (number of different failure patterns)
>     878         9  5 2 1 1
>     956         4  4
> 

These tests are both optimistic (esp 878) about how quickly things will run -
they always pass for me on bare metal.  I'll dig deeper this week though.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>