| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] QA Status |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Feb 2016 01:05:11 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <56AF1AAA.1040700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <56AF1AAA.1040700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | 7Acs7+zEpKr5u0sI/IDLdTzG0GAKfg== |
| Thread-topic: | QA Status |
----- Original Message ----- > [expect these on a weekly basis from now on ...] > Great, thanks Ken! > === Synopsis === > > QA Status from Ken McDonell's QA Farm in Melbourne > > Summary: 23391 run, 51 failed (0.22%) > > Tests that failed on at least 9% of the QA hosts ... > > QA Test Failures Failure Signatures (number of different failure patterns) > 878 9 5 2 1 1 > 956 4 4 > These tests are both optimistic (esp 878) about how quickly things will run - they always pass for me on bare metal. I'll dig deeper this week though. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] patch/RFC - pmrep: handling broken pipe and Exception Ignored errors, Marko Myllynen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates: qa, spec, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | QA Status, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | QA Status, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |