| To: | Paul Smith <psmith@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Metric name length restriction |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Jan 2016 22:27:26 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <7EAFE6E6-1A6E-49FA-A331-DAA168E5320E@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <7EAFE6E6-1A6E-49FA-A331-DAA168E5320E@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | ovuIXNNNhE5JNKA5KNpyLSDS9v7MxQGP01go |
| Thread-topic: | Metric name length restriction |
Hi Paul, ----- Original Message ----- > Parfait currently restricts metric names to 63 characters I think. > > Is that restriction still in place within PCP? I'd that limit something that > could be expanded on? > To the best of my knowledge there's no specific limit set in PCP. There are limits that will eventually come into play, where PDU sizes become restricted to sane large values, so that pmcd never has to allocate very large amounts of memory ... but not specifically to the sizes of metric names (nor their sub-components). Likewise for instance names. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Metric name length restriction, Paul Smith |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates: merges, fixes, qa, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Metric name length restriction, Paul Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Metric name length restriction, Paul Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |