pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates: build, drop pcp-compat, pmatop

To: Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates: build, drop pcp-compat, pmatop
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 18:55:01 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <y0my4bzh8ee.fsf@xxxxxxxx>
References: <87io33pxe6.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0my4bzh8ee.fsf@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: barRnYk5Q+jiC65DP+TDpGIBKwOiAA==
Thread-topic: pcp updates: build, drop pcp-compat, pmatop

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> 
> >       Drop pcp-compat subpackage
> 
> And there was much rejoicing!
> 

But also appreciation that you tried really hard to do the right thing
by Fedora policy.  Thanks Lukas, all merged and working transparently
here after a simple upgrade test locally.

I think the sub-package dependency is fine too FWIW (this is resulting
from an RPMdiff warning, I guess?) ... it comes up every few releases,
and in practice makes no real difference (arguably better to ensure we
upgrade the core packages to the combinations we've tested?) so we may
as well squash the warnings as you've done.  However, the alternate is
equally correct AIUI, so choose whatever way floats your boat...

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>