| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Bug 1133] event.flags / event.missed "anonymous" metrics registered too late |
| From: | bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 04 Jan 2016 20:50:41 +0000 |
| Auto-submitted: | auto-generated |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <bug-1133-835@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/bugzilla/> |
| References: | <bug-1133-835@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/bugzilla/> |
Nathan Scott
changed
bug 1133
Comment # 3
on bug 1133
from Nathan Scott
(In reply to comment #2) > [...] The key is to have the names be accessible -before- the > pmUnpackEventRecord* call. > > It would be possible for fetchgroups to paper over this problem [...] Please don't paper over problems like this. The idea of verifying the fetchgroup APIs with event metrics before merging is to uncover issues just like this one, so they can be considered and tackled properly before anything is cast in stone and it becomes too late. > dummy pmUnpack* call on a dummy pmResult* during the registration phase, > just to trigger the registration code. Convert the existing src/libpcp/src/event.c register_event_metrics() function into an exported API that can be called at the most convenient time for any/all situations. Then update the fetchgroups series accordingly. You are receiving this mail because:
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Question about Performance Co-Pilot and Grafana, Frank Ch. Eigler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 1133] event.flags / event.missed "anonymous" metrics registered too late, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | [Bug 1133] event.flags / event.missed "anonymous" metrics registered too late, bugzilla-daemon |
| Next by Thread: | [Bug 1133] event.flags / event.missed "anonymous" metrics registered too late, bugzilla-daemon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |