pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Issues running QA

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] Issues running QA
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:45:41 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5671D70D.20906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5671184C.1@xxxxxxxxxx> <5671D70D.20906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: SvaQiN5jBUSqWdzkgONbU91m2m+mRQ==
Thread-topic: Issues running QA

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> Hopefully I can encourage you to try once more in the light of these
> comments ... we need to make sure Marko's experience is not the norm
> for a PCP QA newbie.

Some updates to qa/README might help here?  The first sentence says:
"PCP needs to be installed on the local host, with pmcd operational."

We probably should clarify that as "This is the PCP installation under
test - pcp/qa does not make use of binaries from a git or build tree,
they *must* first be properly installed.  Aspects of packaging, use of
certain local accounts, interaction with system daemons, init systems,
and so on - are all exercised by the tests, so this is not optional."

Also, mentioning the use of VMs as extremely helpful for testing might
be warranted (and perhaps pointing to ./Makepkgs again), based on some
other IRC comments.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>