| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] RFC: derived metrics in PCP archives |
| From: | Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Dec 2015 15:00:04 +0200 |
| Cc: | PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <2035219440.34824754.1449184754527.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Red Hat |
| References: | <5660B237.7000709@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5660C64B.3030408@xxxxxxxxxx> <2035219440.34824754.1449184754527.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 |
Hi, On 2015-12-04 01:19, Nathan Scott wrote: > >>> The simple suggestion is to claim another domain, and in pmlogger >>> dynamically map any PMID of the form 511.*.* to <new>.*.* > > Makes sense. > > Marko, from a pmrep config POV I guess for metrics with a "formula" we'd > want to ignore that formula (the derived metric spec, iow) if pmLookupName > succeeds on the metric name (which it would in this case for an archive, ack, will check at some point. Cheers, -- Marko Myllynen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pmrep(1) remaining items for 3.10.9, Marko Myllynen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Few namespace questions, Marko Myllynen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] RFC: derived metrics in PCP archives, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | pmrep: config file version, Marko Myllynen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |