----- Original Message -----
> > [...]
> > > > That seems too easy [...]
> > > I hope it is, good luck!
> > That's not a very helpful attitude really.
>
> I'm confused.
Let me break it down. This is another case of you refusing to work on
fixing PCP bugs, instead only working on your pet features.
You open an absurd number of trivial bugzilla entries, which you then
consider as Someone Elses Problem. "I hope it is [easy], good luck!"
- seriously? You actually wrote there someone else should fix it.
Case in point - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287678 -
your pmstat bug from yesterday. Took all of 5 minutes to diagnose and
fix - you could have easily resolved it. What have you got to lose by
making a bit of an effort?
> > Could you take a break from the feature work and help out? - fix the
> > crash, write a small QA test? Beats documentation littered with
> > references to bugzilla entries, hands down.
>
> I might say I would consider it, were I not concerned [...]
(Worst excuse ever, sorry.)
> into a reoccurrance of the disgraceful PR1105 situation.
You were called out for actively ignoring a bug that prevented part of
your feature from working, and you had to be repeatedly asked to do the
right thing for the project and its users; yes, disgraceful behaviour.
You are better than that.
We did manage to get you writing regression tests (albeit after 3 years
and oh so much gnashing of teeth!), perhaps contributing-by-fixing-bugs
can be the next leopard's spot we work on changing?
Let's work on it anyway, and let this thread rest in peace. Someone
will fix that bug, you can choose whether it will be you or not.
cheers.
--
Nathan
|