pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates: qa and pmlogger init script change

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates: qa and pmlogger init script change
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:23:25 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <564A816B.3080209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <564A4EAF.2060106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <37781480.14026461.1447721696684.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <564A816B.3080209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: dq39rPFiEwADzicFqnmzbqHbHdUwaQ==
Thread-topic: pcp updates: qa and pmlogger init script change

----- Original Message -----
> On 17/11/15 11:54, Nathan Scott wrote:
> >
> > The current behaviour (warn but start anyway) is the result of many,
> > many people requesting this (rightly or wrongly) so we'll be getting
> > a slew of regression reports if this is changed yet again...
> > ...
> 
> OK, the requests are broken, the behavior is broken, but I'll revert the
> change.

Thanks.  I tend to agree, FWLIW, but there are "human factors" involved
here, and not starting a daemon when we were just told to start a daemon
is too much for some.

> > ...  - what was
> > the problem you've come across that led to this change?
> 
> QA failure on Gentoo ... I'll revisit and see if I can smack the QA
> test(s) to either notrun or filter out the badness.

OK, taa.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>