| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: some build/package re-jigging and QA |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:45:45 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <56439F05.10705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <563949B8.9020604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87d1vn81w8.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <56424CB3.5090506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2108185319.9113269.1447193300260.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <87si4cbbjv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <56439F05.10705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | oT0G9wpOOB47IF0xjK7wXk0LKq1oXA== |
| Thread-topic: | pcp updates: some build/package re-jigging and QA |
----- Original Message ----- > On 12/11/15 06:06, Lukas Berk wrote: > > ... > > Thanks for the follow up commit and comments. I'm curious, why > > pmdapostfix wasn't added to this commit? I'm getting a fail for the > > postfix pmda for same reason as the ealier elasticsearch commit. > > I think that was an oversight, rather than intentional (reading between > the lines of Nathan's mail). Yep, I was too focussed on python/perl modules & overlooked that one - thanks for following up guys. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: some build/package re-jigging and QA, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Multi-Archive Contexts: Scaling and Consistency, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: some build/package re-jigging and QA, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: some build/package re-jigging and QA, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |