pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Introducing pmrep - Performance Metrics Reporter

To: myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Introducing pmrep - Performance Metrics Reporter
From: fche@xxxxxxxxxx (Frank Ch. Eigler)
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:31:28 -0400
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <980961654.65506823.1446187043033.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> (Nathan Scott's message of "Fri, 30 Oct 2015 02:37:23 -0400 (EDT)")
References: <560278D5.8010305@xxxxxxxxxx> <5603F9D6.7050306@xxxxxxxxxxx> <159724763.42718898.1443163436257.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <560A9715.4060905@xxxxxxxxxx> <1542966539.49294102.1444091627491.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <563099B1.7000802@xxxxxxxxxx> <980961654.65506823.1446187043033.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
nathans wrote:

> [...]  As we discussed on IRC, that is at a much lower level than is
> relevant at this stage of evolution of a generic reporting API -
> if/when another new fetchgroup API comes along, it will be required
> to sit below these higher level APIs to prove its worth.  [...]

The fetchgroup widgets will get a reasonably high-level pmapi.py
representation.


- FChE

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>