pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [pcp] QA status

To: "'Nathan Scott'" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [pcp] QA status
From: "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:59:37 +1100
Cc: "'PCP'" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1876244778.64327313.1446094094530.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <56318711.3050404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1876244778.64327313.1446094094530.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQFRYyhBZykFe0a5oSoPHDk0/r/WFAHVTh6an3KaxvA=
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Scott [mailto:nathans@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, 29 October 2015 3:48 PM
> To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [pcp] QA status
> ...
> Actually, could you send sample .bad files for all 5 tests above?
> (i.e. all the ones above the 3% fail mark in the farm).  Taa.

There may well be some obvious fixes here, I just have not had a chance to 
triage all the failures (the current 40-odd is down from 200+ a few days ago).

Attached are all (or at least most, sometimes these things move as newer QA 
runs are completed) the .bad files for the multiple host failures.

Thanks for any help that would further reduce the failure profile.

Attachment: bozo-laptop-666.out.bad
Description: Binary data

Attachment: bozo-laptop-956.out.bad
Description: Binary data

Attachment: vm00-892.out.bad
Description: Binary data

Attachment: vm00-956.out.bad
Description: Binary data

Attachment: vm01-892.out.bad
Description: Binary data

Attachment: vm04-964.out.bad
Description: Binary data

Attachment: vm05-964.out.bad
Description: Binary data

Attachment: vm08-727.out.bad
Description: Binary data

Attachment: vm14-727.out.bad
Description: Binary data

Attachment: vm14-956.out.bad
Description: Binary data

Attachment: vm27-666.out.bad
Description: Binary data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>