| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pcp updates: embed shell fragments in pmlogger control file |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:15:47 +1100 |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <56255B5A.9000305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <56255B5A.9000305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
On 20/10/15 08:06, Ken McDonell wrote: All done for pmlogger. pmie will follow later. No, pmie will not follow later.The pmie control file does not have a "dir" field, and the closest would be the "logfile" field, but allowing shell fragments here is (a) not as useful as in the pmlogger case, and (b) breaks the pmie_* scripts when they try to use the logfile field from the control file to match up the running pmie processes. So I'm going to leave the pmie control file alone, pending someone making a case to the contrary. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: embed shell fragments in pmlogger control file, Martins Innus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] OSX El Capitan PCP Installation failure (#48), Paul Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: embed shell fragments in pmlogger control file, Martins Innus |
| Next by Thread: | pcp updates: small stuff, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |