pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [pcp] pcp updates: pmlogger semantics change, 1st round of strtoint6

To: "'Nathan Scott'" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [pcp] pcp updates: pmlogger semantics change, 1st round of strtoint64 changes
From: "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 17:20:09 +1100
Cc: <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <16636812.55406736.1444960652915.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <561F4485.5000903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <213168951.54887359.1444893955669.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <16636812.55406736.1444960652915.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQGET+25ANQNXZ7PeqS2M5t51w08jwIAz7/KAhJs4Eie5ntXsA==
Nathan,

When you're back, could you please send me your qa/src/bar and qa/src/gap 
archives from the failing host (I presume these were remade by the updated 
pmlogger version)?

Ta.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Scott [mailto:nathans@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, 16 October 2015 12:58 PM
> To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates: pmlogger semantics change, 1st round
> of strtoint64 changes
> 
> Hi Ken,
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > > Some review eyes here would be appreciated.
> > >
> >
> > Looks good to me.  Couple of small things I noticed in passing...
> >
> 
> Also seeing a couple of remaining test failures that seem to be from
> this set of changes - .bads attached.
> 
> cheers.
> 
> --
> Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>