https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269921
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Ken McDonell from comment #4)
> pmlogger has always been thus ... or rather ever since it was changed [...]
>
> Biggest fallout risk would be in QA I think. I've looked at the pmlogger
> code and the change there is low risk (and would be the similar to Nathan's
> pmcollectl patch, because the alternative of changing the __pmAFregister()
> semantics is just too scary).
Heh. Thanks for the details Ken! If it gets out of hand with QA, lemme know
and we can go with that simpler patch (no risk, but probably not as nice a
fix).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SRjayPlqcB&a=cc_unsubscribe
|