pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Small pmie QA issue (was Re: [pcp] patch pings)

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Small pmie QA issue (was Re: [pcp] patch pings)
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 23:54:57 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20151008205738.GB12082@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20151001203810.GB7968@xxxxxxxxxx> <5616C970.8020306@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151008205738.GB12082@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: Vq5yMxaJ8NXrc3Q/ggKU4cG2i+mJSw==
Thread-topic: Small pmie QA issue (was Re: [pcp] patch pings)

----- Original Message -----
> > [...]
> > qa/294 - number of context connections and disconnections is different
> >          because there are now fewer pmNewContext() calls on the default
> >          context path.  Needed an updated .out file.
> 
> (Yeah, the sheer number of pmNewContext calls during pmie operation
> was making it difficult for me to debug some of the conversion
> problems.)
> 

I'm also seeing the attached failure in 295 now, which sounds similar to the
above ... anyone else seeing this?  taa.

cheers.

--
Nathan

Attachment: 295.out.bad
Description: Binary data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>