| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] qa/785 (pcp-atopsar) failing |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Oct 2015 06:47:27 +1100 |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5614BBEA.9030509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <56119B44.8070906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1871693773.49282373.1444088184377.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <56145687.6030606@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <101308309.50153098.1444191731440.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5614BBEA.9030509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
On 07/10/15 17:30, Ken McDonell wrote: ... I saw this earlier today in a previous version of my patch ... I still think you need to play with the curtime ... it is not just PM_MODE_FORW that is needed. With the later commits, all the -g atop tests are passing for me now. Thanks, Nathan. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Bug 1269921] pmRecordControl misses the first sample, bugzilla |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] patch pings, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] qa/785 (pcp-atopsar) failing, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Introducing pmrep - Performance Metrics Reporter, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |