pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: perl pmda package install problems

To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: perl pmda package install problems
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:05:08 +1100
Cc: 'pcp developers' <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20151005212720.GC32129@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <00df01d0fd5b$36fb3b30$a4f1b190$@internode.on.net> <y0msi5su02y.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <5612D6B1.8040509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151005203541.GB32129@xxxxxxxxxx> <5612EA0C.7070208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151005212720.GC32129@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
G'day Frank ...

On 06/10/15 08:27, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
...
How about

# yum install 'perl(LWP::UserAgent)'

or local yum equivalent?  That's the point of the virtual resource
name, it doesn't matter what the low-level rpm name is.

OK, +1 for my public ignorance rating.

Never knew about this, so thanks for the tip.

Just in case I'm not the only ignorant one, SuSE's zypper also groks ...

# zypper install 'perl(LWP::UserAgent)'

As far as I can tell, the Debian package manager has no comparable facility and relies on consistent naming of the packages ... this is all a little moot at the moment as the PCP Debian packaging has not yet transitioned to the package-for-everything model that is used in the RPM packaging.

Of course the situation is even less encouraging for emerge and tarball and Mac OS X and Windows packaging (I'm assuming in the latter two cases).

And an apology ... LWP::UserAgent is delivered in the same named RPM in RedHat and SuSE (less anarchy than I claimed), but I was searching for the wrong package name!

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>