pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] patch pings

To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] patch pings
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 20:21:19 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20151001203810.GB7968@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20151001203810.GB7968@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: ItH9X7j1T1y/0rq5vxoySCMeWlVzlw==
Thread-topic: patch pings

----- Original Message -----
> Hi -
> 
> Patch pings re. pcpfans.git branches:
> 
> fche/pmie
> 

Last I saw here was a request for updates, re-review & early merge by
Ken, during first week of last release (which didn't happen) so that
it'd be done before he went away.

But nevermind, this one's changing day 1 pmie behaviour, so not urgent
AIUI (and noone has asked for the little pmmgr-feature dependent on it
either AFAICT ... so again, seems no rush needed here).

I'm assuming you will get to this soonish Ken?  If not, Dave's offered
to take a peek, or I can (we're not pmie gurus though, so it'd be good
if you could).

If there's still concerns about invasiveness, this release is looking
like one we could delay/skip in our regular 6 week schedule, with so
many people having been away (I have further travel pending this month
too).  Might be OK to merge it now IOW, and still get lots of exposure
time with a changed release date, if you prefer that Ken?  (& assuming
no one needs 3.10.8 to arrive as-previously-scheduled...?)

> 
> fche/pmmgr
> 

Ah, good to see the resend requested earlier -

    http://pcp.io/pipermail/pcp/2015-May/007303.html

Oddly, the branch is still missing the fix-up patch I sent you there.
Which was kinda the whole point of fixing pmie first, so that we don't
have to add "permanently temporary" bug workarounds - please add that
in & resend? - thanks.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>