| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] nginx PMDA error |
| From: | Tadej JaneÅ <tadej.j@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:08:45 +0200 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <547701801.30380792.1441927405099.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1441613884.8358.33.camel@tlinux64> <y0m37yqkqph.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <1441790097.27574.20.camel@tlinux64> <20150909125102.GD16438@xxxxxxxxxx> <1441811714.27574.80.camel@tlinux64> <56429816.29582957.1441838180419.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <1441880005.1141.21.camel@tlinux64> <547701801.30380792.1441927405099.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Hi Nathan,
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 19:23 -0400, Nathan Scott wrote:
> >
> > So the relevant part of /etc/nginx/nginx.conf should look like:
> >
> > location /nginx_status {
> > stub_status on;
> > access_log off;
> > allow 127.0.0.1;
> > allow ::1;
> > deny all;
> > }
>
> Ah yes, good catch - I'll update the man page with that information.
Perfect, thanks!
> >
> > For 2), I don't know whether I should file this as a bug report with PCP
> > or distribution's (i.e. Fedora's) SELinux policy?
>
> Yep, selinux-policy - and please CC me. Other PMDAs (pmdaapache) have a
> similar need to access port 80... so I think the right thing will be for
> pcp_pmcd_t to be allowed access, but lets see what the SELinux folk say.
Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262902
Cheers,
Tadej
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Bug 1262722] New: PCP Python PMAPI pmGetOptionAlignment fails, bugzilla |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] SELinux permission problem with postgresql PMDA, Tadej JaneÅ |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] nginx PMDA error, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] nginx PMDA error, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |