|
Hello Nathan,
One of our engineers has completed a manual scan on the updated sources looking for potential license âdisconnectsâ This is what he has reported: 1) All sources from âsrc/libpcp_pmcdâ are GPLv2+ 2) Most sources from âsrc/libpcp_qedâ are GPLv2+ 3) libpcp_qmc library has two source files as GPL: âsrc/libpcp_qmc/src/qmc_time.cppâ and âsrc/libpcp_qmc/src/qmc_time.hâ I donât know whether this is the licensing that you intended for these modules or not. Please let me know if you have any questions. If you decide that the issues above need to be fixed, then let me know if you want me to open a new issue to track it. Thanks, Ed From: Nathan Scott [mailto:notifications@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 8:42 PM To: performancecopilot/pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Martinez Ed-R12594 <Ed.Martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [pcp] PCP Licensing Scheme Problem? (#44) @edfsl<https://github.com/edfsl> all issues listed here have been resolved now in the pcp master branch, and will release in pcp-3.10.7 soon. If you or your colleague do find others, please let me know (preferably within the next week, so we can fix 'em up before the next release) - thanks! Also, I realised my earlier comment regarding your mail to the list was not correct. If your mail bounced, then the oss.sgi.com server / mail service must have been unreachable, it would not have been related to being subscribed to the list or not. What actually happens in the case of an unsubscribed address posting is the mail gets forwarded to one of several list administrators, who allow legitimate emails through - such as this recent one: http://pcp.io/pipermail/pcp/2015-August/008179.html I'm one of those administrators, and I can confirm that no mail arrived on this topic ... could you resend it perhaps, or fwd me the bounce message and let's see if we can diagnose further? Thanks. â Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/performancecopilot/pcp/issues/44#issuecomment-137621260>. — |