pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] another python qa failure

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] another python qa failure
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:01:39 +1000
Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <413619529.5387286.1438851194231.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <55C0687F.2090205@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55C14011.6030500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <413619529.5387286.1438851194231.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
On 06/08/15 18:53, Nathan Scott wrote:
Hi Ken,

----- Original Message -----
On 04/08/15 17:23, Ken McDonell wrote:
qa/739 this time on vm03 PCP 3.10.6 x86_64 Fedora 21

and the same test is failing on vm02 PCP 3.10.6 i686 openSUSE 13.2

739 1s ... - output mismatch (see 739.out.bad)
14a15
./739: line 32: 11035 Segmentation fault      $python
$here/src/test_pcp_options.py -a file param

so it looks like there is really something wrong here.


Not reproducible here so far, but I've pushed a fix into my tree for
what I suspect might be at the root of this - lemme know how it goes?

Thanks Nathan.

I've pulled this commit into my tree and qa/739 is now passing on the one remaining host where it was failing without this change.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>